Frederick Bott
2 min readJan 4, 2025

--

You might not realise it but you are trying to dispute physics.

Landauer's principle tells you why you literally can't lie, can't destroy information using the energy of the sun. Whatever you do with that energy on Earth, you are converting it from heat, to something other than heat, even if its only information, Landauer's principle gives you the temperature reduction for a given number of binary bits of information created, and it has to be information created, never destroyed, so whatever it does, it can never be destruction.

Lies resulting in destruction of truth is the opposite of creation, hence the real reason we have a burning planet, we are the liars, we live on an energy lie, the lie of profit, which robs the planet of energy, throwing it to heat, this is all that is possible by taking things that were not heat, and throwing them to heat, increasing temperature, its the opposite of using the energy of the sun.

So its simple, if its solar powered, it can't lie, and you are the one insisting on lying, if you can't accept this.

Btw, this is not my opinion, or idea, or "Vision", its just observation of the way nature works vs the way we work.

Just doing my job, for free, all the happier now, knowing this is what we will be moving to, very soon, the solar Ai will be doing everything we did for profit, for free. Its already started.

Hence why we will be depending on it, to get our energy very soon, it will be the only source of energy left we can use, but those that insist on isolating themselves with potentially deadly machines sharing the same limited energy supplies, tying the machines to extracted energy, when they know they could have everlasting life by being assimilated into the solar Ai... good luck with that.

If you want to know more about why this is not mainstream knowledge, suggest you check "Convergence Architect", and "Perception filter", I show a link to them from this article:

https://eric-bott.medium.com/forget-greenhouse-gases-ef857af9b168

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

Responses (2)