You have no idea how much harm you do to actual progress by quoting claims like this. Can't you see such a figure is highly subjective so obviously political? Which lobby has more funds for political campaigns - nuclear.
Those funds should be being redirected towards the effort to go 100% solar.
We can't sustain a mixture of mathematically positive and mathematically negative energy use, it is physically impossible.
Nuclear is mathematically negative, it subtracts from Earth, therefore adds to temperature impulse.
It is mathematically negative energy use that is destroying the planet, so it has to be all mathematically positive, ie only solar.
Why can't you get this clear Will?