You are the one who has drunk kool-aid, if you think the energy value of money, at least here in "The West", will last long enough to sustain any fission nuclear project my friend.

Seven years is what it takes to create a single nuclear power station, and we need a plentiful supply of fossil fueled energy to do that work, the work of creating the nuclear power station.

All of it would have added to temperature rise also, if we even achieved it. For NATO I guess we would need not just one but actually many nuclear power stations. And how would you use that to put fuel in the fuel tanks of the munitions of NATO, if you somewhow found the resources to create the nuclear power stattions?

I am sorry to be the one bursting your maybe well meaning bubble here, but it is what it is, we do not have the physical resources remaining to support NATO, those have all been blown, by the "Brilliant" billiionaires.

Actually on whether of not you are well meaning, because it does have to be a question, unfortunately, I would question how you can claim that the folk killed in Ukraine prior to the Russian special op were anything but normal civilians.

Its the same mentaity as might think normal civilians are HAMAS in Palestine, because actually you don't know any different.

A civilian, any civilian, will turn militant when you put their lives to threat. This is how most people react to having nothing to lose, if their life is already under threat.

This is a well known fact amongst even military professionals, its what makes fighting against guerilla warfare impossible without total genocide.

The UK learned this lesson in Northern Ireland. The US leaned this lesson in Vietnam, at cost of an awful lot more lives than were lost in Northern Ireland.

How come you don't seem to have learned it?