You are obviously a proponent of the standard scientific community concept of the big bang, with a name like Dark Energy Articles. I still have never heard anyone explain why we can't identify a location where the big bang startred, in any way I can understand, despite having applied physics most of my life as a professional Engineer, so I remain skeptical. And now studying the energy problem, I think we are making an existantial mistake by not recognising there is only one safe place we can get energy from, it isn't on Earth, it is the sun.

If the big bang theory turned out to be wrong, then we might move on to other ideas about how Earth formed, other than accretion, which again doesn't make much sense to me, compared with a simple possibility that we could have been ejected from the sun at some time in maybe a volcanic phase of the sun.

Way I see it, Earth is just like a big battery, firstly ejected from the sun, with the residual heat in the core being one store of energy, and the rotation of Earth inherited from the sun, again a residual store of energy. The life on Earth is another form of energy, but sustained pretty much entirely be the live energy still coming from the sun.

Do you know of any lfeforms on Earth that we can prove do not live on the energy of the sun, but off of the energy of the core, even indirectly?