Frederick Bott
1 min readSep 8, 2024

--

Why would the Bibles not be history expressed in an abstract way to make sense not at the time of writing, to humans in early development, but some time in the future, when we would be evolved enough to understand?
That's what it looks like to me now, the bibles knew a lot more about profit, slavery, (specifically the unsustainability of it), and the connection to energy than can be attributed to humans at that time.
I write now on how it's all physically connected to emergent properties, which are real superhuman intelligences and forces.
So to me the bibles should be taken as history, just written abstrracted, deliberately so we wouldn't understand the abstrracted message until we need to.
Now we need to understand it, to know we've come to the end of profit, and what we need to do to move on from it.
We might not know that, if it wasn't for the bibles, but we need to wind it all into a common understanding of all religions, they were all meant As guidelines, and we need to use them all, including things like Yoruba from Africa, and Santeria from Cuba, which syncretises Yoruba with Christianity. It's all nature, nature is a collection and hierarchy of emergent properties, it all has consciousness, and we need to understand it to live with it. This my humble-ish opinion.

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

No responses yet