Frederick Bott
2 min readDec 2, 2022

--

Why do you have such a problem with this story, illiciting many negative comments from you, I don't see anything dishonest or harmful, only conjecture.

Conjecture is something to be encouraged, not dumped on, it seems to me. How would we ever learn anything new, if no-one is allowed conjecture, which you seem to be implying is even some kind of dishonesty?

The truth is that there is evidence of domestication in the human genome, resarchers working on the genome say so in research papers, but that is as far as they dare go, because the implications on science of finding anything truly revolutionary on that front are huge. How could they claim to own any intellectual property at all, which science is founded on, and funded by, if they acknowledged we are merely creations of one or more intelligent species which were / are not of Earth?

That scenario actually makes a lot of sense, systemically, we can even explain the motivations of intelligent species creating us for good and bad, which explains also the internal conflict and self denial we are obviously mostly prone to.

It would also explain why we are profit driven, despite that being systemically linked to the destruction of all life, we know this, but still we carry on doing it. It would make sense that we were programed to do it some of us more than others, because we were intended at some point to destroy Earth, by converting it to a form useful to darker forces. We seem to have been programed to break all of the rules of religions, which might actually have good reasons for existing. I hate to say this, but it has to be said, otherwise that would be closer to real dishonesty, not saying what we think, surely.

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

No responses yet