We will have to disagree on that one Patrick, the fact remains that we are still in perfect orbit.
Right there is a simple proof that conventional, profit driven science is wrong about at least one accepted official account of history.
I can give you many.
This is the problem, the fundamental reason why, when someone does a formal analysis, needed to fix the energy problem, as I have done since embarking on that task about six years ago since seeing it coming on related PhD candidate work, it is not accepted, because it cuts through some of the bullshit beliefs of the big bang theory.
Earth's orbit, and the creation of Earth and sun is not due to accretion at all, there are no energy sources on Earth capable of sustain life, the heat energy in the core of Earth is stored energy from when we were probably ejected from the sun during an earlier volcanic phase of its life.
It is really important to identify the real systemic issue here, as said, doing the system analysis reveals it in every box causing a problem, when we break them open and look inside, we find it in every one of us, we are driven by the profit monster to believe in a made up world, sold to us by a long history of everyone selling whatever they have to sell as the truth.
We don't need any one of us to be telling lies, all it takes is for the foundation to be telling only selective truths, then everything built on it becomes great whopping actually existential lies, things like the big bang, which imply all things must ne limited, therefore the energy of the sun has to be limited, therefore there is no difference between that and the energy on Earth, when in actual hard physical fact there is no energy on Earth, it is all stored, sourced from the sun, we have to use it direct from source, or burn.
No scientist dares venture into the story I wrote concluding that actually all activity defined as evil, is done on, and directly dependent on energy which is mathematically negative, that is energy we derive from Earth in whatever way we can.
All of it results in a net loss of Joules put to use on Earth, never a net gain.
This is the opposite of mathematically positive energy, which always adds to Earth, expanding the live capital of Earth, adding things like hydrogen fuel, which burns with no pollution, and which converts to valuable food, removing some of the burden of humans from the natural food chain of Earth (see "Solein") distributing clean water around Earth, when we use it for transportation, and all the while diluting what we've always called the financial capital of Earth, destroying the power of all capital, by literally flooding it out with fresh product from live energy from the only source of it.
Things like nuclear energy and even fusion, all the effort spent on those has resulted in nothing more than loss of yet more Joules on Earth, but hey it gave us nuclear weapons, that can wipe out everything positive we might otherwise do, the ultimate negative energy orgasm, which will be our final act, not very long from now, if we can't kill the profit monster first.
It is starved of the negative energy it lives on, the instant we issue money honestly reflecting the free Joules of energy already accepted from the sun historically, at rates similar to what utilities energy companies have always charged for the supply of Joules from Earth.
I don't know if you've seen CJ Maffei stories, I come across them now and then, but at this moment we are saying more or less the same thing:
https://cjmaffei.medium.com/the-evil-dysfunctionality-of-washington-daf20746cb52