We see almost the same things John. Where we differ, it seems to me, is you don't see destruction as cost, nor actually creation as the opposite.

Whereas my analyses account mathematically and physically for both of those, and connects them each to economy.

We currently monetise destruction, indirectly, by monetising work, and promises to do work (By money-as-debt), whereas we do not monetise creation in any way at all.

I explain this, why it is linked with money-as-debt, why this is technically wrong, and why it needs to change in many articles.

One day, it will sink in, common sense has to come around in the end, to match the formal Systems Engineering, which is the truth, and the whole truth, none of it is arguable.

I hope not too long now.