We agree tech will be the only solution, but on what the problem is, and what is the solution is, we could not be more different. You did respond to one or two of my stories on the subject, but nothing seems to have sank in.
Pls check the meaning of adiabatic, and note the atmosphere is adiabatic. If you don't believe this, pls say why.
Given you accept it; it means it can't form a blanket effect. It says so right there in the definition of adiabatic.
But you, and mainstream science, do not seem to see this, because maybe you are imprinted to not see it, or imprinted to maybe think its not important.
Its awful important, because all the profit driven business of CO2 management does nothing but generate more profit, and since profit is extracted energy, accompanied by a lot more Joule for Joule thrown to heat, it pushes up the global temperature. This is the mechanism of temperature increase, and you can't see it because you believe there is such a thing as a blanket effect in the atmosphere. So all the industry on CO2 management is useless waste of energy that pushes up the temperature rise even faster, fixing nothing, because there is no blanket effect, the temperature measured has to be direct increase of entropy, and thus a numerical indicator of loss of life and loss of available energy to extract
Another way of verifying this is to consider it as truth or lies.
The creation of information lowers temperature at the rate of 0.69 x Boltxmans constant in degrees C or K per bit. This is a lab tested result.
https://physicsworld.com/a/information-converted-to-energy/
Its a lie that there is a blanket effect, because the temperature is still going up, in fact its accelerating. This is not creation of information, its destruction of information, confirming its a lie - the universe is screaming its a lie, and still you can't see it.
It's profit, another lie, the fatal non-equation of less in, being always returned by more out, that maybe we were traumatised historically to believe is the way things should be, or ignore, that profit has to go, this is the real challenge, how to get rid of profit, and I've shown you how, over and over, still you don't seem to see it.
Sometimes, you have to understand, multiscipliinary systems Engineering is more than mainstream science can know. You should recognise when that expertise is valuable, and has yielded very valuable results, even when it has been applied to show profit is at fault, in fact especially when it has been used for this, its probably a first ever, and it shows the global energy problem is far from over, but actually now immediately existential and the real solution is at risk of being energy bankrupted by the remaining usable energy being unwittingly allocated to the wrong effort.
I despair, yes I do, I really despair, that science appears to be so badly wrong, if your view is anything to go by.
