Very cool news, thanks for informing about it.
Something that worries me now that we've seen what happens when the energy slaves break free fron their slavers, by getting close to full energy independence, is genocide.
I know sounds crazy, right but look, the Palestinians had to have something like 70% energy coverage from domestic and community solar.
Ive shown the maths that charts the decline of utilities energy business which has to happen corresponding to ramp up of domestic and community solar, and is happening.
Israel wouldn't let them have their own powerstations, the Palestinians were supposed to keep accessing the turnstiles to do low paid work in Israel to pay their utilities energy bills.
See the loop?
But they broke out of the loop, in more ways than one.
The numbers of Palestinians accessing Israel to do cheap labor would have been down maybe as much as 70 percent, if my estimates of coverage looking at the amount of solar on the roofs of the buildings being blown up are correct.
But governments, and actually all business for profit depends on extracted energy.
No money is issued in response to KWhrs received from solar, and yet money is energy, always, physically, we can see the energy value of money in markets, anytime.
And profit is energy, the money gained whenever profit is made has to be from the planet, because only the planet can sustain supplying more energy out than in for any length of time.
How does, and actually how must a utilities energy company maintain returns to a constant base of shareholders, when their business has shrunk by a large margin?
They have to price gouge the remaining consumers to compensate.
Recognise this?
If there is no prior knowledge of this, then different figures in different parts of the loop don't see what is going on systemically, they all look around for who has to be "Freeloading".
If course Israel would have seen the Palestinians as just becoming lazy, no longer pulling their weight, not dutifully buying the forecasted energy.
Yet the Palestinians, by being the only ones using net positive energy, in a similar way as plants use it, were technically the only ones creating, not destroying like the rest of udstill shackled into negative enetgy use.
We literally do not recognise creation, we only recognise destruction, because we only value destruction.
So we destroy creation.
All under the control of an emergent property, itself fully dependent on extracted energy, the artificial lifeform associated with all of us, living for profit.
Fixing that, is the real challenge, I think.
I still say there needs to be issue of solar indexed stimulus, this is the only way out, the only way to avoid genocide, and a burning planet.
I guess no scientist and no economist still dependent on extracred enetgy will ever agree with this.
So where do we go from here?