Trevor, good find, thanks very much for spotting the similarities and taking the time to point it out.
Yes Nate and I seem to be talking about the same things, he is the first I’ve heard on the same track, though he is more of an economist and I more an Engineer, we separately are identifying the same system.
I’ve watched the first twenty minutes or so of a "Sismique" interview, I will be sure to watch the rest, and probably more videos very soon, but I’ve seen enough already to confirm we are on the same track.
Amazing and a little scary to think Nate has been on it for almost twenty years, and still it isn’t mainstream though.
I could take the time to try to contact him, but in some ways it is sometimes better to allow separate non-competing parallel development efforts to remain separate, so as to confirm the validity of the critical path, two research developments independently coming to the same conclusions is confirmation of a correct conclusion. This is a collaborative safety technique used historically in the development of airborne software, before all became model driven and autogenerated (A vast improvement).
Anyway, whatever happens, thanks for the heads-up!