Too true, thanks for posting, sorry I missed until now, Medium seems to have inserted at least ten days in the wait time for me to see posts relevant to what I always write about. Anyone would think they don't really want folk like us to unite, but that would be a conspiracy theory of course...
Anyhow, some fun thoughts on the big picture effects of Biomass:
Earth is slowing down, we know because of the need to insert leap seconds in clocks. The "scientific" explanations I've seen trying to explain the reasons for this are that it is as a result of tidal friction between moon and Earth. But the slowing down we see is not measured relative to moon, it is measured relative to sun, so friction between moon and Earth doesn't explain it, effectively the combined masses of Earth and moon spinning together are one, relative to the sun, there should be no slowing down of that at all, given there is truly no friction in the space between us and sun.
What there is though, is solar pressure on Earth. Biomass obviously affects that pressure, because it absorbs some of the solar energy landing on Earth. Logically, biomass is hungrier for that solar energy in the mornings, than it is in the evenings, when it has been soaking it up all day, they are saturated. So in the mornings they will absorb more, whilst in the evenings they will absorb less.
That translates to an imbalance in the solar pressure landing on Earth, more pressure will be experienced by the side of Earth receding from the sun, than the side approaching.
We might recognise this is a motor effect, acting to increase the rate of rotation of Earth.
Reduction of biomass then, is a more plausible explanation for the slowing down of Earth, than the one that seems accepted by conventional (Profit driven) science.
A similar analysis exists for coverage by solar farm infrastructure; it also has a similar motor effect in theory.
In fact there are a lot of benefits from solar panels and solar farms coverage like this, which doesn't at all act against biomass, but in harmony with it, the Earth does not need to suffer by covering some areas with solar farms, given that the proportion of coverage needed, relative to that naturally occupiable by biomass, is small.
Imagine also the effects of producing significant "Solein" using exclusively solar power. This would result in a reduction of human burden on food created naturally by nature, the supply of which is dependent on biomass, so would encourage environmental recovery, like we saw a tiny spike of, the only one ever, when Kardashev Money was demonstrated during covid, at the same time as oil prices went negative.
