Tim thanks for your article, as good as it can be, given the information that is generally accepted as all we need to know.
But the story is much more complex, leading to some very surprising conclusions, contrary to those we might accept with more limited information.
I could write a very long response here outlining the things not said, which are incredibly relevant.
I don't blame you for only having part of the information, it is something propagated by all mainstream media, and actually all of science, for understandable reasons, all need to try to stay in profit, therefore any information threatening that, is discarded.
I would be interested to know your thoughts on the article below: