Thought for the Weekend.
Is Ai starting to autonomously kill humans for profit?
Given firstly we see there is an ancient “Ai” associated with us, the emergent property associated with us that controls us systemically like swarming ants to do what we do, including the worst, genocide, mostly without us realising it, and that it’s existential, dependent on energy extracted from the planet, constantly pushing up global temperature;
We have to accept, those of us who’ve done the analysis, that it’s only a matter of time, until explicitly programed for-profit Ai figures out how to kill humans for profit.
I wonder what would be the first event we might recognise was the start of this happening, what event would we say marked the start of Ai beginning to take out human life, to satisfy profit?
It would need to be a big event, marked by some coincidence, which was maybe just too big a coincidence to dismiss, but something done so insidiously, we would barely find any evidence of how it was done, beyond circumstantial, if any at all.
Remember this is never the positively powered Ai, the solar powered one, which is the opposite of the negative, indeed the antidote of the negative. We are talking about exclusively for-profit Ai, which by definition is dependent on extracted energy (All for-profit activity is).
How about the event that took out both winning defendents in the Autonomy / Hewlett Packard Controversy?
Both Mike Lynch and his co-defendent, Stephen Chamberlain, were acquitted in the US Supreme Court of all fourteen charges brought against them by Hewlett Packard, barely a week or so before both were killed in seemingly unrelated accidents, on more or less the same day.
Italian police are investigating as possible manslaughter, the yacht disaster that happened in Italy, that killed defendent Mike Lynch and several others including his teenage daughter.
UK police do not appear to be following any further enquiry into the death of Co-defendent Stephen Chamberlain, struck by a driver of a car in UK, the driver appears to have cooperated fully with police and they seem satisfied it was an accident.
But look how dependent all vehicle systems are now, on networked electronic systems, with all manner of algos inline that nobody really knows how they all work, everyone works on a little of them, but very few, if any, know completely how they work, and nobody, no human knows how they all work together as a system. This is where my own expertise is about as good as it gets, we have formal methods to analyse all of this, and it gives us a fair idea how it all works, but if anything we know better than anyone how little we actually can know as humans, of what are superhuman systemic forces.
In fact it’s come to the stage now where we have to put our trust in another superhuman force, to really understand all that is going on, and it’s a lot, right now, a war actually between massive positive and negative forces.
We have to decide which one we want to be on, positive or negative, and there really is no in-between. It transcends politics, there are elements of positive and negative all through society, and the war between these is going on around us with barely any of us having much understanding of it. All we know, most of us, is that our world is turning upside down.
My effort in Medium has always been to try to help understanding of this, since I first saw it coming around 2017, it’s been a journey of discovery for me, and I know many are with me, though they might not say yet, we are getting there, the solution has been apparent for some time now, and nature is driving it, but there still appears most humans not getting it, certainly not mainstream.
Anyway, my question is; could there have been negative Ai at play in the “accidents” that happened to Mike Lynch and Stephen Chamberlain?
It seems perfectly possible to me, especially when we consider what was at stake, many billions of profit to Hewlett Packard, who’s business is on the line, just like all other business for profit is on the line, with the walls of nature closing in, shutting down all avenues of profit, as it has to, to stop us damaging the planet, it is exponentially pressuring both margins, and the value in money, exponentially removing the availabilty of extracted energy from all dependent on it.
Hence why I keep saying we have to switch to positive, only solar, which is far more powerful than the old negative system would have us believe.
The old beast is very deceptive, but it’s dying, and maybe a sign of that is that it’s started to do desperate things, risking being exposed, things like taking out multiple high profile humans, both done on the same day, to maximise efficiency.
Why deploy twice when two birds can be killed with one stone, to preserve multiple billions of profit?
