Though this is about all I write about in Medium, 350+ stories to date and maybe 9000 responses like this, II won't be buying his book, because actually he does not talk about the thing that matters. He believes economics drive us, when it isn't, it is physics that drives us, the physics of nature and our physical environment. He doesn't know enough about that to understand it, otherwise he would be talking about it in terms of physics, as well as economics, to ensure that what he expects or is planning for aligns with that, rather than contradicting it, because in the end where there is contradiction, nature will force the point physically, as we are seeing now already with a burning planet.
If we had to create a new word to describe what we are necessarily moving to, from Capitalism, I would humbly recommend Energyism.
(Interesting the platform algos automatically capitalised Energyism, so I manually capitalised Capitalism)
If you have money to invest, you should put it towards whatever domestic and community hydrogen backed solar installation work you might see the communities around you needing.
This is what we are moving to, though very few without similar qualifications and experience to me agree with me, common sense has to come around in the end, hopefully before not too much more human pain and misery.
Most frustrating that most folk don't understand the timescales, definitely not Claus et al, nor any of the conventional scientific data, mostly all funded by Claus et al. The closest we can come to describing things from inside the car is a polycrisis, or hyperobject, whilst we watch everything turn upside down and deform.
From outside the car it just looks like a car crash, or even an explosion, in motion.