This is such an outrageously wrong statement, it slips under the noses of most people, but the effect of it, said by a seemingly scientific figure of influence is devastating nonetheless.
It is emotively worded arguments like this that convert directly to emotive arguments for Geo-Engineering, which are then fed to chatbots including GPT-3, to supply the remainder of the B*llsh*t comprising the ads selling Geo-Engineering to VC investors, inviting them to invest in a game of Russian Roulette with the planet, which enables the current work of Geo-Engineering to go ahead.
Why say what you said, whilst omitting that the sun is the energy source of all of nature? Isn't it already clear where this misunderstanding is taking us, to extinction, long before "Billions of years", but actually within only a few years?
The sun created everything we know, and you subliminally make it out to be some kind of villain, setting the entire tone of your story.
Folk should not be surprised the planet is in such a mess. Science, at least some things claiming to be science, could not have gotten this more wrong, and actually we should see is the root culprit of the environmental problem, and that it is a far worse hyperobject than you can understand, if you really think that the sun is our enemy.
It isn't the sun destroying the planet, it is us, by not understanding the energy of the sun, and what it will do to us, if we continue not understanding.
If you really believe that the sun is somehow hostile to us, and have solid reasoning for saying it, maybe you would like to comment on the story below, to show which parts of it might be wrong:
