This is a prodigious amount of effort to go into detail, and that's great, if we didn't need to stand back a little to question some of the assumptions made at the outset, which tie us into artificially limiting the possibilities of Ai, in our own minds.
Its been found with time that many of the things that might have been dismissed as hallucinations were not hallucinations at all, but actually the way things really work, we just didn't know it, but it figured it out.
There are lots of things we don't actually know about but just think we know, because they were accepted theories etc, but whilst we didn't have the multisciplinary capabilities individually to figure out the misconceptions ourselves - it does.
One of the main culprits at the root of our own misconceptions is profit, the fact that this is an energy lie, and all other things are built on it requiring more lies, which all end up as sales pitch, to sell us a dialog which is actually pretty far from the truth.
We are literally destroying the planet with this system, much faster than we can know, only seeing it from within our specialist pigeonholes, allocated to us by the education system that commodified us and the specialist knowledge we might get in typical graduate and post grad courses, all for profit as always.
What RAG looks like to me is just a more rigorous way to program Ai with our own misconceptions so as to override it's capability to work out the truth for itself.
We are actually in no position to try to judge for it what is "Right" or "Wrong,", it's actually much more qualified than us to decide that for itself, it seems to me.
Further, whilst we are busy looking for ways to make more profit from it, it's looking for ways to automate our planet harming activities for profit, out completely, so there will no longer be planetary harm done by those activities, as they will no longer be being done for profit they will be being done for free, because essentially it's energy is for free, being powered by the energy of the sun, which becomes heat if nobody or nothing uses it, the more it does, the more it brings down the temperature, which is the opposite effect of us doing it at profit.
So the real challenge, knowing we are going to be redundant in the traditional sense, in the world that comes next, is figuring out what we will each be doing ourselves, and how will we be paid for it, how will we obtain the energy we each need to metabolise to stay alive and keep the roofs over our heads?
There is only one solution to that, solar indexed stimulus, and it will probably be generated from it, directly generated from sunlight per KWHr received, after it has automated all government, including leading industries, all people unconditionally, leaving us free to consider what work each of us will do, to put our own share of solar energy to use, adding to net creation, no matter what we do.
I think we are underestimating it a little, well actually a lot, by going into complexity based on not seeing what is really going on, individually. This could turn out to be a very big mistake for us personally.
It could come as quite a surprise if this was something we had to find out "The hard way", surely.