These are interesting points you make, arguing fundamentally against solar Indi, difficult to counter-argue directly, congratulations on finding them!

However, the maths of today, not 3.5 billion years ago, is what we should be interested in :)

Capital equates to Joules, whilst energy from the only actual live source of it, is Joules per second.

Joules, in the presence of Joules per Second, are quickly outweighed, tending to zero, only Joules per second remains significant.

There, is the mathematical proof that in the presence of Joules coming in from the sun and being put to use in our economy, capital has to devalue. It is being physically diluted.

Think of the scenario, of owning a barrel of oil, knowing that by electrolysis, hydrogen fuel equivalent to the calorific value of that barrel of oil, can be created in minutes, even seconds, given enough solar energy capacity. Every Joule of solar energy received potentially converts to such fuel, and there are tens of GigaJoules per second coming into every developed economy.

That energy coming in from the sun, diluting all capital is donated, pushed to us for free, no labor of extraction.

Whereas money is issued only on creation of debt, which becomes ultimately promises to do the labor of extraction.

See the problem?

Money is issued for extracted energy, but not for donated energy, even though donated energy is far more valuable than extracted energy, because donated energy creates no pollution, since pollution only comes from labor of extraction.

So, money is devaluing, since we now have significant presence of donated energy, but no issue of money reflecting it.

Until money is issued reflecting it, money will continue to lose value, because it is not representing that donated energy, probably the most valuable thing we can imagine, the energy that powers all of life except us, until now.

When the money is issued, all value will be lost in capital.

Why would anyone save, if we have endless free money?

Like I said, we've actually seen this, when 4Tn stimulus was being issued per month in the states, and, it was actually talked about by Nikola Tesla, although they've tried to destroy pretty much all evidence of those discussions between Tesla and JP Morgan.

The thing is logically there is no reason for an innocent person to suspect that this is not what all people would want, wealth for everyone, but as Caitlin Johnson pointed out yesterday, being rich isn't actually about wealth hoarding, it is about wealth obstructing, which is something entirely different, not very nice, something to be ashamed of, hence the reason why rich folk don't like to hear it talked about.

However, regardless of human emotions, nature is forcing the point this time, they have no choice now the solar energy is coming in, Pandora's box has been opened, money will devalue, until it goes to nothing, or until it is issued, so this time the rich are faced with losing everything and gaining nothing, or giving everything, and gaining the same wealth as everyone else.

I'd say that is mother nature at something like Check, with one move to mate, wouldn't you?