There is only something to explain if you understand the question James. It invalidates the article, if the opposite of the article is true.

I’ve tried twice to ask it now, and no-one has an answer. I have to interpret your response as just simple irritation a question was asked.

Critical argument, we are told, is fundamental to science.

The issue I have with the article is that it implies we are not responsible for our actions.

Is that what you would like to think also?

Thanks anyway.