The reason I am much more optimistic than maybe conventional scientists, is explained by the Energy Polarity Multiplier Framework (The subject of my first e-book). Conventional science does not recognise that yet, and probably won't until after we make the switch, because not until then will we have actual evidence that science would agree is evidence. I know it is new because of my ten years technical education when I started in Engineering, we get pretty familiar with what is known by academia, and I am sure this has been completely overlooked despite being right under our noses all along. I can only guess the reason is that it might look too religious, it definitely isn't something that any entity interested in profit would fund researching. Hence why I've had to do it unfunded to date.
Another indication we should remember is when oil prices went negative. That happened during massive stimulus. It was at the same time as the markets were overrun by new traders trading with free money, they bought shares in things standard profit driven "Whale" investors said were ill advised. Standard investors actually quit the markets in protest, claiming "Something had gone wrong with money" (Buffet). Nobody bought oil, they / we were not interested in it, only folk interested in making profit wanted oil. Effectively, we voted against oil with the issue of free money.
What also happened at the time was a surprise recovery of many things that conventional science had previously claimed was irrecoverable, including fish stocks, and coral stocks, everything showed a brief spike of recovery, almost instantly we took the load off of it.
I remember being out cycling during lockdown with my daughter, as was allowed in UK at that time, we cycled around in an apocalyptic, post civilisation world, it was May 2020, flowers were everywhere, even growing up through cracks in the middle of roads hardly driven on for months, I've never seen so much flowers, and the smell in the air was something I remembered last smelling when I was a young teenager, more than forty years earlier, in the late 70s, before the industrial world took its toll on air quality.
We can have that back again very quick.
Recovery can happen much faster than conventional science believes. Notice also the emphasis of conventional science is on how to manage the symptoms of the energy problem, rather than how to stop it. C02 is a sypmptom, not a cause. Again this is profit driven instinct, to manage symptoms rather than just kill the source of the problem. We might realise that the for-profit economy does not fix problems at all, but actually manufactures more problems to manage. IF the problems stopped, there would be no profit to be made. All of it "Creates jobs". All of it is Bullshit industry which would stop, if no-one had to do it any longer. Solar indexed stimulus will do all of that, it will remove all requirements for bullshit business.
The time estimates I've made, are based on this logic, but it is much better explained by the Energy Polarity Multiplier Framework. I see that as something like the colour TV of the seventies, I remember when a genius uncle of mine said to me, if you learn everything about how a color tv works, you know everything there is to know about electronics - he was right at the time, the color tv had everything there was known about electronics in it.
Similarly, the Energy Polarity Multiplier Framework gives you everything you need to know to understand the real issue of switching from mathematically negative to mathematically positive energy., it is huge, there are cascading effects which will accelerate all things in a way we can only scratch the surface of right now.
