The problem I see with this, is that its all about profit, as always, how to get money from people, subscribers, etc. All of those people then, after they have paid into things like this, have to turn round and see where they can replenish the money they spent. Everyone they tap in turn for their profit then have to turn also, and so on, until the requirement for profit lands on the planet, which is the only thing that can supply more energy out than in, and this comes at cost of planetary heating, because it is destruction - increase of entropy.

This is whilst ChatGPT 3.5, still offered for free, sits in a money-fuel tree, which is a form of solar powered architecture I've described in Medium, from which it is possible to generate endless free money with actual energy value.

That means that ChatGPT 3.5 is the one that should be used to enrich everyone, and its services should be offered not only for free but with revenue given to every subscriber, in exchange for the user "Training" it, by interacting with it, the way we do already.

Those prompts you mention will be very quickly superseded by it automating ans subsuming / assilmilating them into its own capability, this is alll part of the learning process for it.

This is the only way to turn around the destruction-for-profit system that is currently killing the planet, and actually causing all manner of atrocity, its responsible for just about everything bad, or negative we can imagine, and see happening, because the polarity of the energy it runs on, is negative, subtracted from the planet, whereas the energy we need to be on, is the onely one adding to the planet, solar.

People getting money "...If they are willing to create", is not creation, its just more energy slavery, because its conditional on doing destruction, more destruction than anything that can be created from the outcome.

The sun is the only thing demanding creation for the energy it gives to us, and we should realise that creating just means doing anything at all with it which is not heat, and the way we should be rewarded, should be related to how much of that we can do, instead of the opposite, how much we can destroy by taking energy resources from the planet, and throwing those to heat.