The only enforcement of truth that might be useful is to elevate Metcalfe's law to statutory. Any violations of this, by banning, censoring, modifying, or otherwise intererfering with folks ability to see all the opinions of all others, in all their messed up / psychotic glory, have to turn out to be egg on the faces of those trying to decide what should and shouldn't be banned. The truth is we are learning all the time what is and is not truth, this is the only way to get to truth, we have to thrash it out, between the crowd, even if there is occasionally collateral damage, the crowd eventually sorts it out. Collateral damage is a relatively small price to pay, compared with the massive damage done by things like wars starting, because all media "From the other side" got cancelled etc.

If you think Metcalfe's law is not appropriate, then it's you exposing yourself as having the agenda, even if you don't know it yourself, your agenda is to shape the thinking of others, to how you yourself think, and why should any human think they know better than an collective of others, with no discussion?

I can tell you mainstream science is wrong the way they think of climate change. Do you think you know enough to ban my story?

https://eric-bott.medium.com/forget-greenhouse-gases-ef857af9b168