Frederick Bott
2 min readNov 3, 2023

--

The irony of this is that there is solid wealth generated by solar panels, if you add the right techonology at their output, to take up what is not used, hydrogen. Produce this by electrolysis, at whatever efficiency is on the table, and you have revenue per KWhr received for nothing in return for the fuel, but with the bonus of knowin that whatever is put to use, is less energy to do the damage of heating, which we can see is now a global catastrophe, regardless of CO2, wihich is only a symptom.

Hydrogen is valuable to all aerospace, they should be subsidising everyone to start generating it, using solar which is available to all of us, all communities, everywhere.

Solar panel manufacturers themselves have the option to become hydrogen suppliers themselves, to make their own factories energy independent and have alternative revenue coming in, whilst produce solar panels which require labor. With that revenue they have no need to scrimp on what is paid to workers, they can scale it up limited only by real estage available for solar collection. Notice this is valuable product which requires no labor per Kwhr received after installation.

So I actually doubt the claims that China is using "Slave labor", they do not need to, if they know this, and actually they are more likely to know it than we are, because they are less inclined to think always in terms of profit.

We've seen how profit driven misinformation about everything, absolutely everything, is heaped high by our governments, why would this story be any different. There are also plenty Chinese media stories showing plenty of happy people in Uiger communities in China. Do we ever see refugees running from China? Very rarely. This should be telling you something. Also it seems pretty obvious the US has a war agenda against actually any countriy or even big corporate it sees as a potential threat to its economic or military "Superiority".

I think you failed pretty badly with this story Will.

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

No responses yet