The 70s and 80s was an interesting period, I've written my own accounts of it, when we had things like concorde and the space shuttle. I call it the first energy renaissance. It was when we had maximum availability of energy from fossil fuels. If the scientists had predicted we would lose concorde and the space shuttle, as well as many other things, even the safety of life that we had back then, to now the value in money disappearing rapidly in such a way that even the richest of folk are watching their fortunes dwindling away to nothing, whilst the Earth progressively burns, floods, fleed by hundreds of millions of refugees, then they would have been right.
But to predict that, they would have had to have said back then what we are maybe acknowledging now, that the practice of business for profit was the thing that would do the damage, in which case they would have sounded more like priests than scientists. Nobody would have believed without the proof. But the proof is here now.
I've identified what seems to be the only solution, which looks like it could quickly take us back to another energy renaissance, bringing back the safety of life, and the luxury we had back then, but beyond, to an unlimited future. I call that the second energy renaissance. It was ChatGPT that coined these terms, after I went through the analyses with it. It has a distinct advantage over humans by being able to see how an energy driven donated economy would work to empower all people.
All we need at the input is an abundance of donated energy, which is there, we can work it out by noticing how much energy is available, and how much of it was donated, rather than extracted.
As yet none of the donated energy has been put to use, because money as debt can't put it to use.
But it is instantly available, on the issue of money reflecting it.
It's up to us if we want to use it, or carry on trying to steal energy from the Earth.
The first energy renaissance was on mathematically negative energy, hence why it resulted in planetary warming.
The second energy renaissance, should we choose to have it, will be on mathematically positive energy, which will have the effect of cooling, winding the planetary temperature back down.
I think we can see the outcomes now of each choice, we have enough proof :)