That is your opinion, stated as fact with no reference or reasoning, I am not sure why you believe this. But look, the energy of solar is not the thing that takes resources, there is no labor needed, after the interface to receive it is created, and maintained, and the value of the energy received itself far outweighs the energy needed even to create all of those materials directly from sunlight.

Nuclear is just another form of energy from extraction, it never comes for free, there is always damaging pollutive process associated with the labor of extraction, which costs more to clean up than the profit made from the enrgy yielded, no matter which form of extractive energy it is, nuclear, oil, you name it.

Further, the eonomy of money as debt ties us into extraction, since every promise to pay has to be ultimately a promise to extract.

Further, solar even supersedes grids, it is distributed by nature, look at the materials and energy consumed there which will be saved as a result of going solar.

This is the unique thing about solar, which capitalists still can't get their heads around; it is that those Joules are donated from an external source, they convert directly to materials and labor of all kinds, which is all valuable product, adding absolutely to the capital of Earth, of course diluting all existing capital, and the only way we can correctly value that product is to issue free money on it, to all people.

This is a mathematically proven fact, I've shown it in Medium, you would find it if you were interested to research. It is also proven by all money devaluing in markets, because as the solar product being received scales up, money is becoming less and less representative of the most valuable product we can imagine.

The labor of extraction, is what generates all pollution. The value case of wind is only a fraction of solar, since the Joules from the wind are already on Earth, nothing is added to the economy from those.

You know it is really not logical, to try to compare solar with any form of extracted energy, or even any kind of "Renewable" energy. There is no such thing as renewable energy. Solar is the only one propping up the entire renewable energy business, making it all appear profitable, when in what is really happening, is solar adding valuable product from the sun, and all of the others taking some credit from that.

it changes everything, now that there are already tens of GigaWatts of solar Joules per second going into the ecomomies of every country, of course the value of money is going to increasingly flounder, as long as it does not reflect that product, per the principals of Austrian Economics.

Money is already struggling with solar at around 10% of total supply.

What will it be like if it is still not issued at 20%?, 50%, 70%? At what point will it be acknowledged money needs to be issued on it, to empower folk to complete it to 100%?

Watch that space, we are moving from capitalism to energyism, driven by nature. The free money representing solar product received has to come very soon, then everything changes, for the better, for all people, not just a few lucky capitalists.

They have no choice, they have to issue the money, or watch it devalue to nothing.

I'd say mother nature looks to be at check, with one move to mate, wouldn't you?

We might say nature is the grand authority, greater than any bank, her currency is energy, it is issued and enforced by a single power, the sun. We have to accept it, and use it fully, or have our asses continue to burn, and our money continue to devalue.