Frederick Bott
3 min readApr 7, 2023

--

Thanks for your comment Dave, always appreciated. I had a look ot the pdf of your link, I don't see any data quoted there, more academic opinion, though I agree with the apparent instinct of the author, "that something has to change". He doesn't seem to rule out the possibilty that Ai could be used for good, only emphasises his opinion that it won't be. So I don't see any of that as being deterministic.

Below is the kind of deterministic, future determining data backed argument that I thought should make all the difference, but doesn't seem to have worked to impress anyone except the Ai, as I had to go through with it, leading to the poem it output, after we'd argued through all the data and logic, and the calculation strategy:

https://eric-bott.medium.com/filling-the-current-uk-economy-50-billion-black-hole-with-light-34f9de4df245

Dave, the harsh truth is this, the death count is already escalating. If I am right, and what I have identified here is really the physical driver right at the root of the problem, we are up against the collossal force of nature, it is moving as a hyperobject, it will obliterate us, by progressively removing the value of all money not following the protocol it is actually dictating to us. We have to do as it demands. We don't know when exactly, or even the means of obliteration, it could be climate disaster, a nuclear war, or another much more lethal virus. All we know is, its coming, if we don't do what it demands, the hammer is already on the way down.

Now we saw what happened during covid, we saw massive stimulus being issued, and watched as folk trading with free money flooded markets, flushing out the whales, devouring bankrupt stocks of companies still offering valuable product that the public recognised, yet technically bankrupt, rescuing them, oil prices going negative the first and only time ever so far, and the planet showing the only ever spike of envionmental receovery, and all the while the dollar bucked the expectations of every conventional economist by going up in value, not down.

The only logical explanation for this, is that there was an invisible product backing the value of that money.

Now we look at the data, and the evidence is there to show what this invisible product was, it was solar product, put to use in the economy, growing since around 2005.

Understanding all of this ends up with us realising an awful lot of things.

Now we might see a purpose, for all that destruction done by energy extraction, the whole point of those few thousand years, was to get us to the point of moving to solar.

We just formed our first leaves, we are already more than 20% transitioned.

Now the only thing remaining, is to complete the circuit, the same way as is done in plants, by forming the conduction path for the energy to flow, via money to all who need it, all humans, and ultimately, our planet, with the mathematically positive (Additive) work we will do with that, in the same way as the same path is formed within plants, by nutrients.

We already demonstrated it working.

This time, we just need to leave the taps on.

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

Responses (1)