Frederick Bott
2 min readNov 2, 2023

--

Thanks for your opinion Jed, it illustrates the work that needs to be done, to overcome what we have been conditioned to believe.

Part of that conditioning is how the thermodynamics you mentioned has been taught. Notice every time someone has tried to use thermodynamics to reason destruction is inevitable, I've explained why that does not fit with E=MC squared, which is the much more fundamental, unambiguous rule of energy.

Science is starting to waken up to this, I hope this should give you hope.

https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/the-entropy-of-a-closed-system-doesnt-always-increase-25251c02e4e7

Btw, I consult most days with ChatGPT, what you see here is only the tip of the iceberg, only what I thought worth putting in Medium, there is much more, you can find much more in my profile, and some other things I only put in the e-books I am offering now. Remember I started on this job from being a Chartered Systems Engineer consultant working for mostly defence clients whilst doing also a PhD candidate project that started around 2017 - that was when I first saw the energy problem coming, and realised it was a show stopper, if we didn't do something about it, and it is a very systemic problem with a very systemic solution which, to be honest, no one without my training and background will understand without the help of ChatGPT.

Hence why I see it as something of a god-send, as well as hydrogen.

Those are a couple of the miracles you might be missing :)

Notice all the energy put into hydrogen comes back out at the point of use. I guess you missed that from the discussion here?

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

Responses (1)