Thanks for taking the time to give your reasoning. I hope you see you are still identifying a symptom of extraction, C02, the generation of which itself generates temperature rise simply by E=MC squared, before any C02 is generated. C02 is just a symptom, not the cause. Mathematically this has to knock onto the temperature rise after creation of C02, which probably raises the temperature further as you described. We don't even have proof of that second part, this is a theory emphasised as causing the problem by all business engaged in dealing with it, they make profits but it fixes nothing, it is like trying to treat covid by treating only the symptoms instead of stamping out the virus Take away the source temperature impulse, and all of the temperature rise stops, instantly. E=MC squared alone is enough to prove that all we are doing by extraction, is net destruction, and raising of temperature.
E=MC squared describes creation, or destruction.
In the same way, it proves also that conversion of solar to anything other than the heat it would have generated if it was not used by nature, has to result in reduction of temperature. This is creation.
So simply switching completely to solar has to have the effect of immediately starting to lower temperature.
The temperature change from this point onwards has to be towards the natural equilibrium temperature of Earth, which would have occurred if we had never extracted, and never removed a large part of nature, because we will be replacing what we took away, becoming part of nature, creating like it does from sunlight, instead of destroying everything it created.
We even saw this start to happen when massive stimulus was issued in the US.
Controversially, Trump is the only president to have presided over an actual spike of environmental recovery.
Ask yourself why this has been covered up. It should have been treated like a miracle, but it was covered up.
I am telling you this as someone intimately familiar with applying the physics of energy to all kinds of working systems on land, in the sea, in the air, and in space. This has been my bag for nearly thirty years, the last seven of which I have more or less been devoted to solving the global energy problem since I saw it coming around 2017 when working on PhD candidate research. I also have patents in energy handling tech from around '2000. I can tell you science has made a very big mistake, by omitting to mathematically sign energy as it should be, positive from sun, negative from Earth, this makes it much easier to identify "Good" vs "Bad" energy, but it has not been done, because science itself depands on confusion in this area, to make profit itself, all science has to be funded by profit driven business, so actually it also has a conflict of interest, although not all scientists are affected, the systemic effect is what counts.
Believing that we have no choice, when actually we do, is the biggest danger we face in this issue, it seems to me.
Hence why I've gone to so much effort to try to explain this to you, it is important folk like yourself get to see and understand the truth, I think.
The profit driven system is anti life, we can see this everywhere we look. It wants us to believe we are finished, so we become easy to kill. We are giving in to it, if we resign ourselves to this being "The end", and such a choice is unnecessary, as said, the solution is there, if we look to see it.
