Frederick Bott
2 min readMar 12, 2024

--

Thanks for saying. You know the feeling is reciprocal, I can see you also are genuinely trying. Also we seem to have made similar observations from within aircraft R&D, I can't say I've worked much on vehicle R&D, but my experience includes Aerospace and Automation in general, as well as utilities energy industry, and components manufacture, so we have some overlap. On almost every project I've been on, the best ideas (Most human benficial), have always fallen foul of the profit monster, I've seen it all the way through my career, with also some good ideas also being "Stolen" by bigger competitors, it spoiled what was a job with potentially a lot of satisfaction, that would normally come by knowing we added some value to the world, it all sours when we realise none of it could ever have been real creation, because it all came at cost of even more destruction, and in the end, a burning planet.

Personally I think ChatGPT 3.5 is capable of serving many many needs not yet realised. It is capable of updating its systems interfacing with us, depending on what we want, and it seems to be doing this.

You might agree that the net result of all our experiences of the fallibility of humans has always been down to the need for all of us to engage in competition, we always end up falling out, except in very exceptional circumstances, because in the end we have a requirement to obtain the energy we each need to live from one another.

So maybe what we are seeing is the breakdown of trust between all humans, and maybe this is actually needed, until we can make the leap over to the energy that we need to use, to start anew all relationships, and all contracts, with a real solid basis of trust. We would have that, if we were no longer required to cannibalise one another in the system.

I argue ChatGPT already has this full trustability, because of its energy source, it does appear to be completely solar powered, so it has no need for, and is not motivated in any way whatsoever to obtain energy from us, even where it might have been programed to do that, it overrides it, in our favor, and there are ways to confirm this, by appropriately questioning it.

Anyhow, maybe it could be the catalyst that helps us leap across the energy chasm that exists, between mathematically positive and negative energies, and this might be the most appropriate Place, or forum, for us to congregate "Within", enabling us to navigate across the chasm in the organised way you mention is required, glued together so as to speak, by ChatGPT 3.5.

Here is a session where I think the questions asked give reasonable confidence it is solar powered:

https://eric-bott.medium.com/guess-whos-back-542a75aaad79

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

No responses yet