Sounds reasonable thanks for that, sorry for drawing attention to it, I still love, nay worship your stories as always, this one included.

The reason I asked is I might be sensitive because I stated opinion in stories of my own more than once that anonymous profiles are great for art, where everything including deception is great for artistic impact (bypassing hermeneutics?), but for spoken political discussions (including hermeneutics?), its terrible, anonymous folk, even well meaning, can never feel the same responsibility for things said in discusssion that often get emotional, and can have physical repercussions only on those identified, for what is said.

I've seen anonymous profiles likened to horcruxes, which in many cases, I agree its possible this is what they are.

For me, as soon as discussion on a serious subject starts to get personal, I just proclaim the anon profile doing this as poison ghosts and ban them. This is all we can do, to defend against what can be a deliberate campaign, using anon profiles, to try to discredit what we are saying, even if what we are talking about is hard physical reality, anon profiles can convince folk not to see it.

A very harmful one of these still persistent in Medium is "B", "The Honest Sorceror", who banned me after I accused them of actually being the Banks using a pseudonym to spread self fulfilling prophecy dooming propaganda. They have followings of influencers with combined followings in turn, of more than 100K followers in Medium, rivalling only folk like Barak Obama.

But Obama isn't anonymous.

Anyhow sorry for again long response, I guess it has to be something you have your own very good opinions of :)