Sounds reasonable, as good a place to start as any.
Something to be wary of though, is if we do move to solar indexed stimulus, thus ending profit for most modes of business, many businesses will just stop, there wont be any point continuing them, it would be the business that only exists for profit, that folk generally hate working for anyhow, "Bullshit jobs", and "Bullshit Industry", which would cease.
One of the strongest, most direct arguments I've found (Am finding more all the time), confirming profit will have to end, is the scenario of trying to supply solar energy at profit:
If we convert the money that might be paid for solar energy sold at profit to KWhrs at market rates, more KWhrs than are delivered and metered to the consumer would need to be paid by the consumer to the supplier. In other words, the net flow of energy would be from consumer to supplier. This is the maybe surprising truth in all cases of utilities energy supply at profit, as stands.
The difference could not come from more solar, unless maybe the consumer had some solar power themselves. But then why would the consumer need to buy any energy, why not just scale up their own solar?
So the difference would have to come extracted from the planet.
This would defeat the cooling effect we have identified with solar, the planet would continue to deteriorate and be destroyed, with consequential rise of entropy, and thus temperature, because effectively we would not really be solar powered, we would just be using it to ramp up extraction.
Hence why the energy from solar should be delivered for free, there is nothing to be gained by charging anything for it, all the charge does, is put a barrier in the way of how effectively the energy is delvered / propagated, given we will always need money, and the energy we each metabolise has to continue to be delivered as money, in order that we can carry on using it to buy food, which again should probably be sold on energy content, as far as we can establish it. The system will then be auditable, in a way that we will be able to compare the money in circulation with energy known to have been received as solar, and if we see more money coming into circulation than there should be from the known solar energy coming in, we know the problem is not yet fixed, unauthorised energy extraction we might define as an energy crime, since this is what heats the planet, and we want to reverse increase of entropy by maximising what we use from solar. Does that make sense to you?
