Sorry but I can only guess you still have not read the links I gave you, otherwise all of this would be much clearer to you.
Solar energy is not monetised.
The second link gives you the reason why, and the proof with numbers.
Here is the self verifying truth:
Money is energy, always. It always has a price in markets in KWhrs.
When money makes money, or when a little energy of labor is exchanged for more energy as money in return, the energy in the profit gained had to come from somewhere, because energy can't be created nor destroyed, just pushed around.
The only thing that can respond with more energy out than in, for any length of time is the planet.
This is the deal wth the planet, we only get energy out of it for energy put in, but it gives more out than in.
Compare with the sun, it gives what it gives for nothing. It asked nothing in return.
Money issued as debt, as all money is, is a requisition to do the work of energy extraction when all other work is done. That work can only be done on the planet, never on the sun.
Money issued as debt can't monetise the energy from ths sun, because the sun asked nothing for the energy it supplied, whereas money issued as debt has to have a return.
So solar energy is not monetised.
The only way to monetise solar energy is to issue funds representing it for free - solar indexed stimulus.
If you doubt this, read the numerical proof in the second link.
The fact we do the energy lie of profit without even realising it makes it a dishonest energy con at best.
At worst it makes it outright theft, because we can see how it works now.
Its theft of the energy from our planet, and we continuously throw this to heat.
The temperature rise is related to profits made, not CO2 or any time related factor, this is why it is impossible to predict without auditing the energy flows from sun to Earth, and from Earth to humanity.
We will never fix it by only addressing symptoms, the only way it can be fixed is to change what we are doing, from net destruction, to net creation, and the only way to do that is to switch to the only energy source whcih adds to Earth, rather than subtracting from it.
This is what we have wrong - we do not monetise the energy being used to reduce temperatur, like plants do.
They issue nutrients to transport the energy from where it is received by its leaves to Earth.
Nutrients are the currency used by plants to transport the energy creating everything we know.
We have to do the same with our currency, now that we too have leaves like plants.
As long as we don't do that, we can't survive, like no plant could survive if it didn't do this when it forms leaves, it would have to die at birth if it couldnt use the energy of the sun.
See how it works?
