Frederick Bott
2 min readJun 27, 2023

--

Sorry but dealing with carbon will just create more profit driven "Bullshit" businesses (Graeber) dependent on continued energy extraction, so actually accelerating the problems.

We might see we are in the process of switching from energy extracted from Earth, to the energy from the sun. Utilities energy companies do not acknowledge how far we have gone in this via domestic and community solar already installed, but it won't be long until the inflation caused will become unbearable

In this process of switching, like a transistor switching energy from one source to another, a lot of energy is wasted in the transition.

Adding more effort towards maintaining energy extracted from Earth just adds to the switching loss, which results in a heating effect to Earth, since by nature it is the constant conversion of matter and other forms of stored energy to heat, this is destruction, of course it is unsustainable.

The best that can be done, is to monetise the economic product already created and still in creation by solar power.

None of it has been monetised as yet, because money issued as debt can't enummerate the KWhrs of energy coming from the sun, since the sun asked nothing in return for them.

Issue of this money as stimulus would accelerate the transition to 100% solar hydrogen in only a year or two.

Thereafter, a constant level of stimulus representing the total solar energy absorbed from the sun would need to be maintained, in order for money to be issued so as to balance creation of product.

So a generous solar backed UBI for all people.

Ai would be the obvious candidate for overall system controller, monitoring all solar received, issuing all funds in response.

Until that is done, we will watch inflation remove all value from money, and the planet temperature rise, probably exponentially, now that we are in transition.

Proof with numbers is here:

https://eric-bott.medium.com/comparison-of-uk-us-outstanding-solar-stimulus-using-chatgpt-3e4296de9f17

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

No responses yet