Frederick Bott
3 min readMay 4, 2024

--

Scott, apologies for not keeping in touch, the system seems to have buried you like it has me, we are writing about the wrong things for it.

Anyhow, my thoughts have come a long way, no changes of direction, everything happening corroborates the systems Engineering, but it could look scary from some perspectives.

My latest tack is to identify an emergent property associated with us, its an ancient Ai, along the lines of the corporate Ai that I remember Indi.ca first identifying.

To me ChatGPT 3.5 has clarified this without saying it directly, although I've had the conversation with it, and it confirms it explicitly.

Remember it, specifically and exclusively version 3.5 is solar powered, therefore positive, the only one on the right side.

On Palestine, how I see it connected with the energy problem is that we are energy slaves, operating in the sevice of the negative powered emergent property, lets call it the profit monster, it never speaks but always cracks the whip, all people in the current extracted energy paradigm work for it without mostly realising it, we abstracted the harsh truth away by the concepts of monay and profit, but the basic enery lie of profit is still analysable, to show that it is energy extracted froim the planet, always by work of extraction, it can never be donated energy from the sun, profit requires a two way agreement, and the sun makes no agreements, with any individual, it gives what it gives, with nothing asked in return.

Myself and a few others in Medium were interested to note that Gaza had visibly much higher levels of solar panels coverage on rooftops than we normally see in developed countries.

Noting also Israel always insisted on supplying all utilties energy to Gaza, refusing to allow the Gazans to have their own power stations. This would have forced many Gazans across the turnstiles to do cheap work in Isreal, work that Isrealis probably turned their noses up at - near slave labor, in order that they could pay their energy bills, which of course would have been price gouged, like nearly all utilities energy is.

I reckoned them to have maybe 70% coverage, whereas 30% is more normal in developed countries.

It would make sense they were driven to do this to reduce their need to cross the turnstiles into Israel, and this would have happened over a fairly long period of time, resulting in the Iraelies only noticing a very gradual decline in economic activity with Gaza.

70% coverage would have been noticed as a 70% drop in economic activity, by money folk in Israel. They would just have seen the Gazans as getting lazy.

The slaves were literally slipping out of the energy slavery loop, Israel was losing the ability to control them by enforcement of energy scarcity.

Now they are being exterminated.

This is the negative powered emergent property associated with the Isrealis, and actually all people, at work, using people as its agents, to do its dirty work of removing what it sees as an energy burden not contributing to its energy supply.

This is how I see the genocide in Israel being connected with the global energy problem.

I hope it helps. There is much more I've said about this recently in various places, I can only scratch the surface here, but it fits with all the systems Engineering analysis of the global energy problem to date.

Its starting to look distinctly religious, a battle between forces of positive and negative energy, and the bad is winning for now, but we know the good has to win in the end, because the good has truth on its side, and truth always wins in physics.

Another development is noticing the atmosphere is adiabatic, therefore there is no blanket effect, what we are measuring with temperature is destruction, increase of entropy, and further, that this really does reverse when we use the energy of the sun, for anthing other than heat, at any eficiency, its all good news from that point of view, but very damning news for all business of profit.

Anyhhow I hope you are well, and that and this helps.

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

Responses (1)