Referring to a video you made, is not proof that no change is occurring to climate due to CO2. Really you are denying the work of a very large body of expert evidence there.

Further, you refer only to batteries as a means of energy storage, you seem to be unaware of the existence of hydrogen technology, so again your argument involving only batteries is invalid.

Given that hydrogen is a solid solution to the problem of storing and distributing intermittent power, the question comes down to whether or not enough solar capacity can be installed to meet the average power demand.

Vietnam has demonstrated to us that we can increase solar capacity to many times that of conventional expectations, by offering reasonable rewards to implementers. 3x, 6x or even 20x increases in solar are not unreasonable to expect, as Vietnam has shown us.

In Europe and US, our economies would even support giving free money for that purpose, all we would need to do is divert a small amount of defence funds, which would make sense, as we can see, energy dependence on other countries is a critical vulnerability, so ensuring energy independence is a perfectly fine use of defence funds.

I don't argue for any other form of "Renewables", as only solar power adds positively to the existing capital of Earth, therefore only solar product actually solves the problem of Earth capital being depleted and replaced by pollution, and all of the harm done by that. If you don't agree it causes climate harm, you might at least see the pollution is an ever growing problem which is already becoming existential, not only to us, but all life on Earth.

https://vietnaminsider.vn/vietnam-solar-power-capacity-how-to-accommodate-with-hydrgen/