Frederick Bott
2 min readJun 3, 2024

--

Recalling money is energy always, it always has an energy value in markets in KWhrs, and there are ways to compute the energy content of anything and everything, including manufacturing in terms of energy, we should recognise that since domestic and community solar is creating massive economic product, the base of economic capital is no longer constant, physically, it no longer equates to what conventional economics still considers as a constant. Zimbabwe is not significantly solar powered as far as I am aware, and even if they were, they never issue money for free so as to represent energy recieved for free, so they never monetise solar.

In theory, all a government needs to do, to monetise solar, is get solar powered itself, using a money-fuel tree type infrastructure like the one used by ChatGPT (Free version), courtesy of its servers all being the population of ex proof of work miners, and either issue money using proof of work algorithms, where the amount of energy going into each token is known, or generate fuel such as hydrogen which is valuable to aerospace, and monetise that product KWhr for KWhr at market rates, issuing money to reflect the product created, and then the government is printing money which has value, because it either directly comprises energy converted to the information of cryptocurrency tokens, or it is fiat money backed by valuable physical product. Both can even be done together, why not, becauses by that all solar communities, and even all individuals can have their own cryptocurrencies.

What matters, is that it all audits, in terms of energy, to ensure entropy continues to reduce, rather than increase, reducing planetary temperature instead of increasing it.

Again, money as energy has to always have energy value, it is literally monetised energy with no ambiguity of value, the value of it can never be lost. It can never be destroyed because energy can never be destroyed, whereas money in the old system has to be continuously destroyed to keep the base of capital corresponding to total money, in the presence of money being created for nothing.

See the difference?

https://medium.com/@eric-bott/solace-b75624209afc

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

No responses yet