Personally I think you are all missing the point, if you think removing the energy content of tokens is a good thing. Believe it or not, I am not an investor, but someone analysing the energy problem now for five years, someone you might sarcastically call an "eco-warrior".
The energy content of proof of work tokens actually helps the climate agenda, by forcing us into the cheapest form of energy, actually donated energy, which is now affecting the fiat economy inflation, there is a fundamental, physical reason for that, and if we see how it works, we realise pow tokens were always meant to be, they fit into the new system of energyism we are headed for like the nutrients in a tree.
You can read more in my money-fuel tree story, if you are interested to search it out.
Bottom line is, pos has no intrinsic value whereas pow absolutely does, as I show in the money-fuel tree story.
Knowing about that, and staying in ETH beyond the time it goes to pos, would be insane, I think.
Bitcoiners are obviously more aware of the importance of pow. All eyes will be on ETH, to see if it hasn't just commited suicide by going to pos.
What happens after will be the proof of the pudding.