Perfectly put, thanks for posting.
I don't get what has happened to the logic of the European "Leaders" allied against Russia, or China either for that matter.
How do the people of Finland, and Sweden now feel, that they have become the next Ukraines, to be used as cannon fodder and lain to waste like Ukraine has been?
Do they not see that just like Ukraine, their leaders are indirectly being paid, and even equipped with big guns, to point at their neighbor?
Or even that the one offering them payment and supplying the guns is the psychopathic, soon to be bankrupt, distant pipeline cutting, gunslinging gangster of the world, that has its own kids being slaughtered in schools nearly every day by their screwed up, evil ideology that more guns makes everything safer?
Why are we even still listening to these insane idiots, we should just walk away, NATO has proven itself the opposite of what it is claimed to be. Peacemaker it is never. Warmaker it definitely is.
And... what is the effect of it on energy?
Why is no-one questioning it from an energy point of view? Would it even exist if we had energy security? Doesn't it directly and indirectly use up so much fossil fueled energy that it has become an unacceptable load?
Can it exist at all on truly sustainable energy? (No).
Why are scientists and environmentalists not asking how much does NATO contribute to the climate problem?
How can we not see everything is wrong about it, nothing is right about it.