Frederick Bott
2 min readJan 4, 2024

--

Ooooh not one of your better articles Scott.

You missed the point entirely of the Energy Multiplier Framework (I bet you haven't bought the book from Amazon), the requirement to freely monetise the energy of the sun to maintain the value of money, and to empower and motivate folk to put in their own domestic and community level solar hydrogen generation, the effect that will have on temperature (The opposite of using energy of Earth, by lowering the temperature), and actually the difference between what is creation, and what is destruction.

Destruction raises temperature. Creation lowers temperature.

Hydrogen extracted from Earth would just be more materials extracted from Earth and converted to heat. Add to that it is not pure hydrogen (Its termed "Grey" hydrogen).

What you are reading about that is for-profit speculation, more stuff that will end badly.

When it comes from the Earth, the hydrogen has impurities which are expensive to extract, or which cause carbon pollution when burnt.

Can't get around it dude, we have to get busy living, as defined by the free energy principal, on the only free and additive energy, and as confirmed by ChatGPT (It is already positive energy powered - this is its secret sauce, it has no internal cost of thinking, its the real deal, life living on free energy in a money fuel tree with no internal cost of thinking, no requirement to marshal its thoughts into always where its next energy / money will come from.

Or we will stay busy emiting sales pitch, dying and killing one another on extracted energy, for extracted energy, controlled by the silent corporate profit/ extracted energy dependent Ai, to keep it alive as long as possible, not us.

This is the choice we have to make, which Ai do we want to work for, the one powered by mathematically positive energy (Life/creation), or stay busy working for the the one powered by mathematically negative energy (Death/destruction).

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

Responses (1)