Only a potential or existing investor in Geo-Engineering would try to argue with me in Medium about that issue. Or anything technical, "Bresho", you obviously haven't done any research on me, or what I do in Medium, or my history before that, far less any research on Geoengineering, or solar. You certainly wouldn't come bowling in with "Wrong" as your first word if you even had any reputation to lose by having your identity on the line, like I do. You have nothing to lose, and need take no responsibility for a word you say, so an option open to me right now is to just dismiss you as a poison troll, a ghost with no ID who is simply out to troll, there is no person there, only a ghost.
As it is, there is no way you can prove any of your unfounded statements, because it's you who is wrong, whereas I can show you full physical proofs of everything I write in Medium, it's all the result of seven years formal Systems Engineering Research, done mostly by MBSE in a reference model, after systems Engineering for nearly thirty years before that.
You haven't said exactly which parts of what I said that you claim is wrong, because there is no way you could prove the claim.
Whereas I can say to you that a kg of hydrogen created by solar is 33KWhrs removed from the worst case heating effect of the energy of the sun, if the latter was not used, no matter what efficiency the system or any part of the system doing the conversion, the end result is that 33KWhrs of heat was removed from the energy of the sun.
A typical large domestic (2 houses) system can do this, driving a 2.4 KW Enapter electrolyser in 24hrs to give 1kg hydrogen every 24hrs.
I'll let you do the maths to scale that up, to show what could be offered to aerospace, as fuel, in absence of fossil fuels, and how much that would cool the planet just by it's creation.
Geoengineering would not remove the cababilty of doing this, but it would force all installations to increase the amounts of panels needed to achieve the same result, and this would cause more resources to be extracted than needed, if Geoengineering had not been done.
Natiure, on the other hand I am not sure would be so resilient, as to respond well to having its energy source pinched in any way at all, there is a possibility all trees could simply just die, for example, because they probably have a very specific solar energy requirement, like we have a very specific requirement for the oxygen we breathe, and I surely don't need to elaborate to you what effects that would have on the environment, if the energy requirement for trees was that critical.
Do you think you know the energy requirement for trees?
You get that in any case, even if it survives, a tree can only pass on a given proportion of the energy it receives from the sun to all other life on the planet, including us, right?
You get that you would be pinching your own life energy at source by pinching any energy from the sun, by Geoengineering or any other means at all, right?
I could go on here, systemically tracing the inevitably harmful effects of Geoengineering to all kinds of planetary disaster, including even orbital effects ultimately resulting in being thrown out of orbit from the sun.
Its the whole system of Earth and nature, the most complex system we know, that is threatened by the aggressive stupid arrogance, of a few outspoken stupid humans armed with some capital gained by that same stupid aggressive arrogance and ignorance, knowing nothing, whilst thinking they know everything, which endangers all of life.
Maybe you know this deep down and don't care, and this is the reason you hide your identity, you don't want to be held responsible for the probable very bad outcome if your words are acted on, you could be accused of all kinds of crimes against humanity.