ok, in case you might not feel like following the links, long and short of it is that we will never switch to solar at profit, because profit is an unsustainable energy lie, a dishonesty which is not possible in terms of energy, it can only be done by abstracting energy as money, and only then if there is a third party that takes the hit of supplying the extra energy in profit - the planet, because only it can supply more energy out than in for any length of time.
A human trying to do it would be energy bankrupt in no time, in other words, dead.
If you tried to supply solar energy at profit, you would need to charge more kWhrs as money, than you were delivering as electricity, all money converted to kWhrs at market rates.
The extra energy you received from the consumer as profit, has to come from somewhere else, probably not the sun, unless maybe the consumer was alreadygetting their own energy for free from solar, but that would defeat the purpose of supplying them with energy, right?
Fact is, it has to be given for free if its supplied as utilities energy, and the economic product generated by it, such as hydrogen, valuable to all aerospace for example, has to be monetised, so that there is money in circulation to trade the hydrogen.
So it looks like profit, at least profit on utilities energy supply has to end, for us to get over to solar. And who is going to go to the trouble of supplying others with energy for free? I suggest there will be some folk who will, after we start to realise that the reward for doing that, is more than money can buy.
On wind, hydro, volcanic, oceanic, nuclear, all of them take energy which nature has already done something with, to convert it from energy that would have been heat from the sun, if it was not used.
All we do, when we use it, is convert it back to the heat it would have been, if it had never been used. We are literally undoing everything done by nature, when we put any energy other than solar to use.
That is monetised destruction, which is obviously unsustainable, and we should not be surprised it comes with temperature rise. It's a basic law of entropy, destruction = temperature rise.
The only way to make the switch is to start monetising creation, and this is the only way to start getting the temperature back down.
It's also the only way to get the energy value back into money. Energy quantifies what we can do with money, always.
If you really want to get into the depths of the system analysis, (Because there is much more, I only scratched the surface here), I suggest to buy the Energy Polarity Multiplier Framework book. It gives it to you in the most concise and understandable form, imho, it was done with the priceless assistance of the solar powered Ai.
