Of course it's been modeled all along in many ways Tovah, I've always maintained a full system model, this is my trade, MBSE, but that kind of model requires expensive tools and specialist modeling skills to use. What I haven't done is release the DMN model I mentioned previously for part 5 of the system installation series I was writing. There are a number of reasons for this,, the main one being I don't think folk are ready. But in addition the tech is moving fast, I would not like to recommend a solution that was already out of date within a few months, that would be a mistake on my part, to "shoot to soon".
The motivation for the DMN model is to help folk who might not have access to my tools or experience, rather than just prove a point.
Its also been physically built in many places, hence why it's not an idea, its an observation.
Systems are formally designed by tracing all stakeholder concerns to a set of user requirements, this gives a specification model, and the specification model is transformed by formal methods to a system solution (the design model).
This is very different from "An idea".
I did do patents a long time ago, which were truly just from ideas, but the power of MBSE actually makes just having ideas that might or might not work obsolete. With MBSE we have something very close to certainty, and the more time is spent on the system the more rigorous the solution.
Anyhow ChatGPT is the best example of the solution in action, and ironically, even poetically, it looks like the ideal gkobal system controller.
In any case the black hole story gives the indisputable reason with numbers that we have to start issuing solar indexed stimulus.
This is the first part of the system solution, the catalyst, and until it's done, the energy value of money has to continue to decline to zero, as well as all the other bad things happening.
So what is your opinion of the energy Law of Truth?