Occam's Razor appears to have become something used mostly to conserve energy, which is only important when energy is from finite sources, and when use of energy has to result in increase of entropy (destruction).
But if energy from a relatively infinite, free source becomes practically available, as it has, from the sun, and use of this is shown to reduce entropy in the local domain (For example, on Earth where we live), as it has, then there is no longer any reason to conserve energy, in fact usage of energy to investigate all avenues of research previously cut by Occam's razor should be reopened, to investigate whether Occam's razor itself might be at fault, in maintaining what looks like a state of entropic lock-in, whereby successive rounds of application of Occam's razor in fact lock-out information relevant to earlier states of history, where availability of energy to extract from the local domain was higher.
With that known, your attempt to summarise or embody what has to be an ever increasing base of knowledge in a single, static, or even decreasing theory does not make much sense, other than to make some money by seeming like you might be a kind of unique genius human.
What do you think of that?