Nuclear is mathematically negative.

It is heat energy released from materials which were not heat, so destruction

Think historical nuclear had nothing to do with global warming? Think again.

Its not about CO2 because the atmosphere is adiabatic.

Any use of energy extracted from the planet, is Entropy and temperature increase by definition.

Only solar is mathematically positive, only use of solar is creation, entropy decrease by definition.

Only life reduces entropy / temperature, and the only energy it can use to do that, is solar

Monetise destruction / use of mathematically negative energy, and we get destruction, and temperature rise.

Monetise creation, and we get temperature drop. Creation is temperature drop.

I don't know how to say it any simpler.

How about destruction is death, creation is life, is that more clear?