No but you will get hunted down and "Brought in", as we see with Assange. Also if you have high enough profile you will be ridiculed and discredited using the usual media, as your own article on Chomsky shows.

He isn't alone btw, there are many clever people who have similar doubts as to the parts played. How about Oliver Stone, has he gone mad also?

You are wrong also about censorship, Metcalfe's law shows us why. More information is always better, for us to decide for ourselves what is good and bad, and when it is bad, who should be held to account.

Billioins of eyes are a far better judge than just a few.

My own interest is towards trying to help sort out the global energy problem, which we are being distractred from by war, even though the energy problem is fundamental to the reasons we are seeing friction between East and West, and if it ends up with nukes flying, we are done as a species, no bunker will protect anyone or anything. How does a bunker survive when the world around it dies?

If I had to guess at your own agenda, I would say you appear to be part of the propaganda machine, busily setting up folk who are easily influenced, to be prepared for full-on war.