Nick, thanks for replying. What studying and writing on this subject now for quite a few years, using all the tools and experience I've been lucky enough to gain as a Systems Engineer for nearly thirty years has done for me, is show how all things are connected.
Things absolutely will change, very soon, because they are physically unsustainable, in terms of energy and capital.
I know this with certainty.
But I don't know what direction it will go in.
There are two, one very bad, and other very good, it seems to me.
If there is indeed a conscious force in charge, like maybe those in Davos, we might identify them as the scarcity enforcers.
They work to preserve the system of wielding capital for gain.
For that to work, they have to suppress all knowledge, or propagation of knowledge of abundance.
We might realise a real reason we are being flooded with weapons, could be to provide us with the means to self-exterminate, hoping all ordinary people (The future poor), will turn against one another in some kind of "hunger games" scenario.
We might do that if we believed that there was nothing else left to do, but try to steal whatever our neighbors might be holding.
But everyone has forgotten close to $4Tn stimulus being handed out per month in US, and the dollar value going up, not down, whilst oil prices went negative, amongst a stack of other pleasant surprises.
We issued similarly massive money all over the world, paying people to stay indoors.
The work I've done on solar now makes it clear to me that it has a distinctly different effect from work done using capital. This is even physically provable, we notice pollution is a product of work done with capital, whilst work done with solar needs generate no pollution.
Weapons of all kinds including biological and nuclear are all forms of pollution.
Why does even saying that make me sound insane? Yet it is the truth, if we define pollution as something anti-life.
Life is energy. Pollution destroys life.
All energy comes from the sun, and we are using it, but as yet not monetising it, only capital is monetised.
So we have to work with the energy of the sun, to do any kind of positive work, all other work is negative. The work we did with free money, was work done by solar power, it is just that we have never formally put these "two and two" together.
All of this is very simple physical truth, that we can't believe because we are so mindwashed into believing that scarcity enforcement is the right way to do things, the only way to do things, and yet that is what ties us into the fatal loop of extracting all energy from Earth, with the accompanying generation of pollution.
It ends very soon, because we are reaching the tipping point, an exponential process that not many seem to be able to see has to end in the next year or two, no more.
The question is will we destroy ourselves, with the pollution including weapons, or will we start issuing limitless free money to all people, backed by limitelss solar energy?
Will we still need weapons after that?
I think not.
All the best to you too :)
