My own problem with established science is that it is pretty much all driven by profit. I think many scientists, probably the majority don't realise how much being profit driven creates and drives their narrative, which often ends up being false, and after a publication leading to profit is accepted by a whole community of scientists, all driven by profit, it is very difficult for anyone to unravel that kind of misinformation.

An example is Geo-information, there are many credible scientists believing and researching that, and yet even a child can work out that it would impact plant life, whilst a systems Engineer experienced in orbital mechanics can work out that the change in reflectivity of the planet would increase the solar pressure on us, enough to break the equilibrium maintained over millions of years, throwing us out of orbit.

Another is that energy is not renewable at all, and we should not even consider solar energy as something in the same basket as things like wind, wave, etc. Again that terminology seems deliberately created by folk not seeking to actually fix the problem, but to make a business from it, for as long as possible.

I know your heart is in the right place, but trying to identify rules that can be followed to successfully root out misinformation, could do more damage than good, in my opinion, because science is not always exactly correct, and in this case, as far as I can see, not many scientist seem to really see the problem of extracted energy very clearly.

All pollution comes exclusively from the extraction processes involved in extracting energy, the single source of energy which comes with no extraction is the sun. We are putting to use tens of Joules per second of those in every developed country. They do the same work for us as any from extraction. But because money is only issued on debt (Promises to pay), which are ultimately only promises to extract, only the energy from extraction is reflected by issue of money.

So, as solar energy reception scales up, necessarily, money is becoming less and less representative of actual valuable product, the most valuable we can imagine, because it comes with no pollution, after the interface to receive it is built.

So we see inflation.

Knowing now the mechanism behind the inflation, we should see the only thing that can be done to stop it, is issue money reflecting the donated energy from the sun. To do that honestly we have to issue it to all people for free.

There we should see a stimulus which would enable all people to complete the transition of all of humanity to solar, thus maximising our future financial stipend froim solar, for all people.

How many conventional scientists do we see researching, talking about, and writing about that?

You might appreciate an analogy of humanity being a little like a baby. It is running out of food from its exhausted mother (Earth), whilst food is being offered on a plate from behind, the baby pays no attention to the plate offered, searching instead for more nipples, because it understands only food which has to be sucked to receive.

But the baby has to learn to take and consume the food from the plate to survive, and maybe grab some more for its dying mum.