Frederick Bott
2 min readFeb 24, 2024

--

Lucas one of the strengths of formal systems Engineering, my trade, is rigor. It forces us to uncover every stone, nothing left unconsidered. The whole point is to get a thorough coherent view, where everything fits, all stacking up.

I also maintain an industrial tooling set, to maintain in turn the system model, offline. The tools I use are Sparx Enterprise Architect and Matlab Simulink.

My specialism as a Systems Engineer is Model Based Systems Engineering.

Sorry to keep referring to credentials, but you do seem to have a tendency to underestimate the legwork I've done on this. I also have energy patents in my history, from some time working as a hardware Engineer in Utliites energy supply industry, a long time ago.

Ive covered most things in multiple stories.

On albedo related analysis, I'd point you to this story:

https://medium.com/future-vision/disingenious-geoengineering-8ecf29ce3677

On general energy and heating effects I would point you to this:

https://eric-bott.medium.com/understanding-energy-d14b313586d2

You might not agree with some of the principles there, maybe still some of the old school misconceptions still persist, but this is the way the system stacks up by my analysis.

It could be incorrect, but the chances of it being incorrect are very slim. There is overwhelming circumstantial evidence indicating everything is correct. I would need to have made serveral fundamental errors, where the errors all miraculously stack up, to have made any mistakes at all.

It is interesting you state the problem is not heat, when the planet is already burning, more and more each year, and we are even seeing a non-linear flick. I explain why that is happening, it is related to profit. The more profit is made, the more the temperature is pushed up. Notice all business involved in carbon capture is profit driven. CO2 is a symptom, a multiplier, of the root cause of all the problems - we are taking the wrong energy, and putting it to use, instead of taking the right energy, and putting that to use instead.

Last year, many kids in new York were left with lifielong breathing disabilities because of the exposure to smoke from Canadian wildfires, a thousand km away.

This year will be worse.

I've said that for three years now, and been right every time, unfortunately. It is not just worse, but exponentially worse.

At what point do you think we might see something like an atmospheric explosion, when a large volume of air filled with a critical mixture of dry flammable dust and gas from vegetation drying out to tinder is ignited?

We are very literally playing with fire which could very quickly get as bad or worse than nuclear war.

To me it looks like heat is very much the immediate problem, this is what we need to wind back down as soon as possible to avoid further damage to all life, not just human, the damage done by removing things that used the energy of the sun is way beyond what mainstream knows, it seems.

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

Responses (1)