"Just as much radiates away"
All the other effort you went to was invalidated by that assumption.
You do not know this. Nor do I. Neither you nor I are deities either, but you are making the assumption that just as much radiates away, as if you would know about that. If it all radiated away, there would be no life on Earth. The presence of life is proof that at least some of the energy does not all radiate away. The more life there is, putting solar energy to use as anything other than heat, has to have the effect of temperature reduction.
Hence why we can liken Earth to a battery, energy being input from the sun, adding to Earth, and energy being taken back out, subtracting from Earth. The sun is the source charging Earth at the positive terminal, and humanity as stands is a load at the negative terminal, drawing the energy back out, much more rapidly than the charge rate.
When we go solar we provide an extra path of conduction, that is creation, putting even more energy to use than nature did by itself. That would be us in creative mode. By that we would no longer ba a load, like any baby born from mother or egg. We might see this fits perfectly with what nature intended all along, by creating us. Hence we can become a very valuable enhancement of nature, increasing the rate of energy put to use by nature.
Meantime, the more subtracting we do, always for profit, and always because of profit, the more the temperature has to go up. We can only add from solar. This is the only way to get the temperature down. The more solar we use, the greater the negative temperature impulse.
Also this has nothing to do with politics, so don't try to distract with politics.
What we do know is that materials are constantly converted to heat by being destroyed. This is the principal effect, the first driver of heat. After that all other effects are multipliers.
What I also personally know is that I am wasting my time with you because by trying to bring in politics you show that you have ideological beliefs which override your logic, ability and any will to recognise or respect actual physical research, experience, and evidence. You will believe what you choose to believe, nothing more.
So I am done here. I already did six years work on the energy project, unpaid to date.
If you really want to try to argue with it, you will have to go to the research, and dispute the whole formal Systems Engineering Analysis.
Good luck to you backing nuclear of any kind, by my analysis it is impossible because solar unmonetised will devalue money faster than you can invest in anything long term which is not solar.
