Frederick Bott
3 min readMay 26, 2024

--

I've pretty much come to a conclusion that profit seems to be at the root of all the problems.
Its a kind of weird agreement in terms of energy, the agreement that one should gain energy from the other.
When we expend a little energy to gain a lot more beck out, this has to always propagate back to the planet because only the planet can provide more energy out for a little put in. When energy profit is made from us, we have to make energy profit from someone else to make up the deficit, otherwise we would be quickly energy bankrupt (dead, by not even having the energy we need to metabolise).
And look, what it actually is, when more is taken out of the planet than what was put in, it's destruction, which is increase of entropy, and look, this is what we are measuring when we measure global temperature, because there is no greenhouse effect (another profit driven lie), the atmosphere is adiabatic, therefore there can be no blanket effect by the atmosphere.
So profit goes straight to temperature rise, and look, we just measured the highest per month temperatures ever, for the past twelve months running, it's accelerating.
Then we look at solar and we see the proposition of using it involves no further work after implementation, there is no relationship between energy yielded for energy put in, it's for free per KWHr, it literally physically can't work with profit.
When we have energy coming in to the pre-monetisation economy from both solar and planet, and we try to issue money at profit representing solar, it plays a trick which is almost beyond our ability to detect it, it switches the energy actually monetised from solar to energy from planet. Isn't that clever?
The end result is if money is issued for free, as it was during covid stimulus, at first, the value of money went up (and the planet cooled, just enough to allow coral and fish stocks to show recovery. I've shown how that could have been because the economic product created from solar was finally being monetised, and by not being monetised, the energy value of money is impacted.
Then then when it was announced the money was not for nothing after all, it needed to be paid back, everything went back to the way it was, we were beck to losing value in money, whilst it becomes increasingly less representative of the only energy scaling up, whilst the others wind down, solar of course is the only one winding up.
So we can't have solar energy at profit, we actually need to give up profit, because profit is monetised destruction, increasing entropy and temperature, whilst solar is the opposite, when we monetise it, by issuing money for free representing it, then we are monetising creation.
And look we have lab tested evidence that creation of information is entropy reduction thus temperature reduction, whilst the deletion of information is the opposite, and look what lying does, it deletes information... the universe knows when we are lying! "Liars, liars, planets on fire!" The whole for profit economy is an energy lie, it was always a kind of slavery, a protection racket, an emergent property, an imprinted, trained behaviour, that looks like it maybe started with grain being hoarded for seven years, it's disguised by the trick played by profit, with all lies built on top of that base energy lie, the whole thing results in a world removed from physical reality, that a few get to live in, whilst the real world heats to burning, and here we are.
Pretty inarguable reality, it's harsh, but this is the hard truth, we went off the rails when we started to say profit was OK, when it never should have been.

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

No responses yet